Sunday, November 7, 2010

An interesting article appeared at a German news magazine Spiegel -- Who's Afraid of the Ruler of the Silk Road?


By Erich Follath and Christian Neef

Uzbekistan is both a nation of terror led by brutal dictator Islam Karimov and a partner of the West that is an important staging ground for NATO's war in Afghanistan. Its story is best told through the eyes of two men -- the flamboyant former British ambassador and the current top German diplomat in the country.

Some cities are tedium set in stone, joyless places where people don't live but merely survive.

And then there are the cities whose names alone are the stuff of legend. They are places of stunning geography, impressive history and breathtaking architecture. Three of these cities are Samarkand, Bukhara and Khiva, located on the legendary Silk Road in Uzbekistan in Central Asia, lined up like a string of pearls, each rising up from the shimmering heat of the surrounding deserts like mirages. These are magical places.

Their turquoise domes, madrassas decorated with mosaics and ornate caravanserai roadside inns are not only evidence of the skill of those who built them, but also of the ambitions of the ethnic groups that proudly left their mark on the region in past centuries: Persians, Greeks, Mongols and Turks. In the 19th century, the British and the Russians competed over strategic bases and mineral resources in the region, in what was known as the "Great Game." After 1920, Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin drew the arbitrary borders that would later outline the Central Asian nations. Today, the region's conflicts are crystallizing once again.

Uzbekistan is the most populous and probably most important of the new Central Asian countries that emerged from the former Soviet Union. Islam Karimov, the Communist Party's first secretary in Uzbekistan prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, easily transitioned into his new role as president, brutally eliminating all opposition and placing members of his family into positions of power. Today Karimov has his eye on billions in future business. Uzbekistan is the world's sixth-largest cotton producer and has massive reserves of natural gas as well as gold and uranium deposits. It is potentially a wealthy country.


A Supply Base for Afghan War
For the world's major powers, there is much more at stake. Military bases, for one thing. Uzbekistan borders on Afghanistan and serves as a supply base for the war against the Taliban. The Germans have their largest and most important supply base in the southern Uzbek city of Termez. They are also interested in building oil and gas pipelines from Uzbekistan that could help satisfy Western Europe's energy needs. Finally, drug prevention is an important issue for the major powers. Some of the world's most important heroin trafficking routes pass through the region and are controlled by Islamists, who threaten to deploy their fighters to commit acts of terror well beyond the borders of these countries.

This explains why we are now experiencing a revival of the Great Game. Only this time a few other powerful players have joined in: the United States, China, Iran, India and Germany.

Once again, they are competing for influence in the region. And, as in the past, foreign envoys play a central role. Just like in the old days, they have a presence on the ground and send reports back home.

A Briton from Norfolk, who is extroverted, narcissistic and combative, and a German from the town of Hüls in western Germany, who is introverted, reliable and accommodating, managed to land their dream jobs. They were named the ambassadors of their respective countries in the Uzbek capital, Tashkent.

But how should they handle an authoritarian country that is so important for the West? Should they flatter the dictator to wrest concessions from him? That would be in the interests of European politicians and military officials -- and perhaps also in the interests of the Uzbek civil rights activists behind bars, who wouldn't stand a chance without a gentle, behind-the-scenes slap on the wrist. Or should they confront the dictator with his misdeeds, sharply criticize his human rights violations and expose the regime, and thus risk a breakdown in relations and the loss of all influence? And how much scope do the ambassadors, who are largely expected to follow their governments' instructions, actually have to make their own decisions on such matters?

With their different approaches and diametrically opposed characters, the only thing these two men have in common is their sincere commitment to a difficult host country. British Ambassador Craig Murray, 51, and German Ambassador Wolfgang Neuen, 63, are ambassadors of a somewhat different stripe. This is their story.


An Upstart and an Outsider
It is the summer of 2002, and the new British envoy has only been in Tashkent for a few weeks. He finally has time to catch his breath, after surviving the obligatory appointment at Buckingham Palace. Craig Murray has every reason to be proud. Following diplomat posts in Poland, Russia and Africa, he is now the youngest ambassador working for the British government. He is only 43, and already he is an ambassador in an important, embattled country.

Nevertheless, Murray still feels like an outsider in the club of private school and Oxford and Cambridge graduates in Whitehall. He doesn't get their jokes and he despises their arrogant demeanor. Murray, on the other hand, is from a working-class family and attended Dundee University, not one of Britain's more prestigious higher education institutions. He believes that everyone in Britain's class-conscious society can immediately recognize him as an upstart and an outsider. Perhaps this is the source of Murray's rebellious streak and his pronounced sense of justice. Fighting is his life's motto. And so is not taking no for an answer.

Uzbek's national holiday is an obligatory engagement for diplomats in the country. The protocol in Tashkent requires the ambassadors to arrive hours before the ceremony, forcing the diplomatic corps to endure the 40 degree Celsius (104 degree Fahrenheit) heat without complaint. But not Murray. He issues a written statement informing the Uzbek government that in the future he will not arrive until shortly before the ceremony. The defiant letter gets him the recognition of his fellow diplomats, who would never have dared to take such a step. But it alienates the Karimov administration.

Unlike his predecessors and most of his fellow diplomats, who tend to focus on the capital, Murray insists on traveling around the country, to beautiful places like Samarkand, for example. But Murray also travels to places where there are no paved roads or acceptable hotels, such as a remote corner of the Fergana Valley, an area strongly influenced by fundamentalists, and to what is left of the polluted Aral Sea, where residents live under wretched conditions.



A Grisly Document
On these trips, he discovers that some of the factories for which the government collects foreign funds are nonexistent. He keeps in contact with the few civil-rights activists who dare to criticize Karimov. And he attends the trials of opposition politicians accused of terrorism and insurrection against the government.

Most of the accused are Islamists, but whether they are truly guilty of any crimes is questionable. Witnesses make contradictory statements, attorneys, who are most likely bribed, collude with the prosecution, and death sentences are pronounced almost daily. Murray is appalled. He hears repeated reports of horrific cases of torture. They seem credible enough, but there is no evidence, because the relatives of the accused are even denied access to the bodies of the dead that are in police custody.

One evening, a sobbing woman comes to the embassy, a grisly document pressed to her chest. She managed to open her son's coffin and secretly took pictures of his maltreated body. "He was an opponent of the regime," she says. "That's why they immersed him in boiling water and tortured him to death."

Murray has heard enough. He decides to set an example. He sends the photos via diplomatic pouch to the pathology department at the University of Glasgow and requests an expert opinion. Two weeks later, the professional coroners submit their report, concluding that the victim suffered severe blows and that his fingernails were ripped out. The most likely cause of death, according to the experts, was submersion of the body into a boiling liquid. Murray informs Whitehall and makes sure that the diplomatic corps in Tashkent is made aware of the case.

"You're certainly not a normal ambassador," an Australian human-rights activist says admiringly. "I certainly hope not," Murray proudly replies.

But there is also another side of the heroic Craig Murray who, with his blonde hair and tinted glasses, looks a bit square. He isn't just a provocateur out of conviction -- he is partly motivated by sheer enjoyment of provocation. And despite his wedding ring, he is a womanizer par excellence. In addition to beautiful women, he also has a fondness for alcohol and is an expert on all kinds of whiskies.

Murray is always good for an ostentatious appearance, consistently coming across as a pasha. He attends his accreditation ceremony in a kilt. The appearance features on Uzbek television news for days. He prowls the belly dance and striptease bars of Tashkent and has a reputation for being generous to the dancers.


'Fürst Bismarck Quelle'
The route of German diplomat Wolfgang Neuen to Central Asia is a long and convoluted one. Originally from the western German town of Hüls, Neuen served in Germany's diplomatic missions in Chicago, the Yemeni capital Sana'a, Valetta in Malta, Brazzaville in the Republic of Congo, and Paris, before being called to the Silk Road in 2000. But before being sent to Tashkent, Neuen first served as ambassador to neighboring Tajikistan.

In the Tajik capital Dushanbe, President Emomali Rahmon behaves like Karimov's little brother -- no less authoritarian and almost as brutal. Although in Moscow's shadow, he has a small amount of latitude to maneuver among the powerful. In the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and the invasion of Afghanistan, Washington, the European Union and China suddenly regarded the small, mountainous country as an important ally.

The German ambassador diplomatically urges the powerful to exercise moderation. For Neuen, a model husband and father, drinking and womanizing are as inconceivable as secret meetings with Islamists. He is respectable and reliable, and more predictable than exciting. Local business people, whose respect he earns by using his excellent government connections to open doors for them, nickname him "Fürst Bismarck Quelle," after the brand of mineral water that's supposedly always on his table.


Outrageous Statements and 'Misconduct'
Murray makes some outrageous statements in Tashkent. In a 2002 speech at a conference hosted by Freedom House, he says: "Nobody should seek to underestimate the genuine security concerns of the government of Uzbekistan and the difficulties it has faced in countering those who seek to use religion and the problems of poverty to promote terror. ... But let us make this point: No government has the right to use the war against terrorism as an excuse for the persecution of those with a deep personal commitment to the Islamic religion, and who pursue their views by peaceful means. Sadly, the large majority of those wrongly imprisoned in Uzbekistan fall into this category."

A colleague from another Western embassy, who tends to keep a low profile, warns Murray by quoting Oscar Wilde: "If one tells the truth, one is sure, sooner or later, to be found out." And the reaction from London comes swiftly. Murray is warned not to exceed his authority and not to continue behaving so "unpatriotically." The administration of then-Prime Minister Tony Blair has long adhered closely to the policy of then-US President George W. Bush, which is that Uzbekistan is an important ally, and that everything else must be secondary to this principle.

Murray, agitated and beleaguered, decides to take his mind off things. He sees a long-legged, 22-year-old dancer in a nightclub and falls desperately in love. Nadira, who is from Samarkand, has a biography that is not untypical for Uzbekistan. She spent her adolescence in the drug scene, and later worked as a teacher with a salary that was barely sufficient to survive. Murray is realistic when it comes to his prospects with the dancer, who, with her perfect proportions, could easily win a Miss World contest. "Such beauties are normally out of reach for a slightly overweight, graying guy with bad teeth," he says. But he has something to offer. And he doesn't mind that he has to spend a long time fighting for the self-confident young woman.

His marriage fails. Nadira moves into his residence. He refuses to hide her and takes her along to official events. What should I wear, she asks? Buy something pretty, he says. Nadira chooses an outfit that looks like a school uniform, with an extremely short miniskirt. It's the talk of Tashkent. And, of course, Whitehall learns of Murray's escapades. The dossier detailing his "misconduct" grows.

But Murray keeps playing with fire. He sends coded telegrams to London in which he accuses the United States of using information gleaned from confessions obtained under torture in Uzbekistan. He later learns that the CIA is secretly flying terror suspects to Tashkent so they can be interrogated under torture. He finds it "outrageous that British intelligence also uses information from such grossly illegal practices." London avoids giving him a clear answer.

Again and again, Murray pokes fun at the naïveté of government officials at home. When a senior official from London, concerned about the supposedly rampant flu epidemic, asks whether she should wear a face mask during a trip to Tashkent, he writes in an e-mail: "I have no idea. How ugly are you?"



'A Disgrace for the Entire Foreign Office'
The Foreign Office is not amused. The undiplomatic diplomat is advised to resign. When Murray refuses, the Foreign Office takes disciplinary action against him. His fundamental criticism of Karimov is not part of the government's case against him, at least not officially. Instead, he is accused of frequently going to work drunk, using his official car for private trips and handing out British visas in return for sexual favors. Murray is beside himself over these attempts at character assassination. He has a physical and mental breakdown, is flown out under dramatic circumstances and is admitted to the psychiatric department of London's St. Thomas Hospital. "That was my personal purgatory," he says.

Once he has recovered, he convinces the Foreign Office to allow him to return to Tashkent, where he fights the charges tooth and nail. In the end, Whitehall orders the suspension of its inconvenient envoy -- the worst end for a British emissary since Charles Stoddard was beheaded in Bukhara in 1842.

Foreign Secretary Jack Straw calls Murray a "disgrace for the entire Foreign Office." But Murray receives words of consolation from the usual "leftist" suspects. For playwright Harold Pinter, a Nobel laureate in literature, who describes Murray is "a man of decency." Actress Vanessa Redgrave invites him to dinner and US linguist Noam Chomsky writes supportive e-mails.

Murray is ultimately vindicated for his anti-Karimov stance. In May 2005, the dictator orders security forces to fire at protestors in the Fergana Valley. More than 700 people are believed to have been killed in a massacre in the Uzbek city of Andijan. The death toll may have been twice as high, but Karimov blocks an independent investigation and claims that the victims were part of an Islamist uprising. In light of these brutal excesses, London and Washington can no longer get back to business as usual. They issue sharp protests through all diplomatic channels.


Cozying Up to the Uzbek Dictator
Ambassador Neuen has already left Central Asia by the time of the Murray scandal and the Andijan massacre. He is now serving in Washington as the head of the German Information Center, which is to help overcome the alienation between Bush's America and Germany under then Chancellor Gerhard Schröder. Once again, he proves to be a smooth and skillful diplomat, a conciliator who knows how to mediate. After his Washington assignment, Neuen is sent home to serve as a division head in the Foreign Ministry. In 2009, he is finally assigned to Tashkent. He is already 62, two decades older than Murray was when he assumed office in Uzbekistan. And, as is the nature of things, Uzbekistan will be Neuen's last post.

The career diplomat makes one thing clear from the very beginning: He will not spare Karimov from having to address critical questions behind the scenes, and he too will meet with civil rights activists -- to an extent he finds reasonable -- who are attempting to strengthen civil society. But all of this is to take place on the quiet. Ambassador Neuen has no intention of openly challenging the regime, or possibly contradicting Berlin's established policy.

That policy consists of cozying up to the Uzbek dictator. The Germans joined, but repeatedly circumvented, the EU sanctions against Tashkent after the Andijan massacre. The entry ban against leading Uzbek politicians was already lifted in 2005 when Uzbek Interior Minister Zakir Almatov was given a special visa for medical treatment in Hanover. And in October 2009, Germany was the leading force behind the decision to lift the EU weapons embargo against Uzbekistan.

"Our country has made enormous progress, which is recognized and valued all over the world," Karimov said recently. But the dictator is apparently the only one capable of seeing a positive side.

Transparency International has declared Uzbekistan to be one of the seven most corrupt countries in the world. Reporters Without Borders rates Uzbekistan 160th out of 175 countries when it comes to freedom of the press, and the conservative US Heritage Foundation puts Uzbekistan in 158th place in its ranking of countries on the basis of economic freedom. Human rights organizations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are sharply critical of Uzbekistan for brutal child labor in the cotton fields, systematic torture and arbitrary court decisions. AIDS activist Maxim Popov was recently sentenced to seven years in prison for his involvement in HIV prevention efforts. In Uzbekistan, a self-proclaimed ideal country, social problems apparently cannot be allowed to exist.

The two previous administrations in Berlin, the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and Green Party coalition under former Chancellor Schröder and the SPD and Christian Democratic Union (CDU) coalition under Chancellor Angela Merkel, believed, for reasons of realpolitik, that they had no choice but to come to terms with Karimov. Merkel's current coalition government with the pro-business Free Democratic Party (FDP) is continuing the same course. The Germans have a strategic air transport base in Termes near the Afghan border. It serves as a hub to supply the German contingent in the Afghanistan war. Every soldier who is deployed to Afghanistan changes planes in Uzbekistan, from an Airbus to a Transall aircraft. The German military could not fulfill its mission without Karimov's goodwill, for which he is paid handsomely each year with an estimated €20 million ($28 million).


Murray's Despair
Former Ambassador Murray fell upon hard times after his forced resignation from the diplomatic corps. In addition to suffering from depression, he also has a serious heart condition. He also has financial problems. His wife is divorcing him, and any money he still has will go to her and the children.

His employer's attacks are especially hard to take. He often thought of committing suicide in the past, he says in retrospect. His girlfriend Nadira, who moved to England with him from Uzbekistan, keeps him from doing it. He pays for the acting lessons she has always dreamed of taking. Sometimes the couple can hardly afford to order a pizza. But his fall from social grace is almost as hard to bear as his financial decline. His loss of status is painful, although he still insists that he enjoys "being an outsider."

Then things take a turn for the better. His attorney convinces Whitehall to withdraw its charges against Murray (except the charge of violating secrecy regulations), and he is awarded a settlement of about €460,000 for leaving the Foreign Office.

He takes the money, buys an old, red fire truck -- and enters the British election campaign. He has selected a specific district, that of his archenemy Jack Straw. He is looking for revenge. But, as an independent candidate, he manages to capture only 2,085 votes. In his disappointment, he later goes so far as to say that the British election system isn't much more democratic than the Uzbek system. Nevertheless, he adds, he will continue to fight against every injustice. The upstanding Murray is something of a blend of a Scottish Braveheart willing to stand up against dictators, a Don Quixote tilting at windmills, and a Michael Kohlhaas, who was prepared to smash a lot of porcelain in the name of justice.

In early 2008, Murray's girlfriend Nadira, after completing her training at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art, celebrates her first minor success as an actress. The play for one actor, performed at a London basement theater, is taken from real life, her life. It's called "The British Ambassador's Belly Dancer."



'The World Here Doesn't Let You Go'
In June 2010, we pay a final visit to Wolfgang Neuen at the German Embassy in Tashkent. It is an ugly, functional building located near a memorial to the victims of the Tashkent earthquake. We share a bottle of mineral water in his sparsely furnished office.

Of course his job is a balancing act, says Neuen. He points out how important Uzbekistan is for Germany, but that this doesn't mean that one can overlook Tashkent's democracy deficits, and that it's important to continually draw attention to undesirable developments. As the current ambassador, as a proper career civil servant and as a conscientious servant of German interests, he says, he cannot and will not comment on the details of his job. But people in diplomatic circles say that the criticism of the gentle admonisher has had its successes here and there.

One of those successes was the case of Umida Akhmedova. The photographer had been charged for "insulting the Uzbek people," because her photographs depicted Uzbek village life as backward. When Neuen interceded on her behalf, Akhmedova was spared a three-year prison sentence.

But shouldn't Berlin's envoy express his opinions in a more decisive, open and controversial way?

Neuen speaks of building bridges and reaching understandings. It sounds as if he were writing a speech for his new boss, German President Christian Wulff. Recently, however, there was reportedly a heated argument between the German ambassador and the particularly obstinate Uzbek justice minister. No comment, says the ambassador. Anyone who spends some time conversing with the diplomat and learns about his initial experiences while traveling around the country can imagine that there will soon be two hearts beating in his chest. It seems clear, however, that the reasons of state prescribed by Berlin, the dictate of good relations, will probably always win out in the end.

Will he return to Germany when he retires in two years? Probably, says Neuen, running his hand across his carefully parted silver hair. He envisions a peaceful retirement, with an occasional trip to the regions of the Silk Road. "This world here doesn't let you go."


'A Very Fallible Human Being'
In the fall of 2010, we visit Craig Murray one last time, in his surprisingly modest suburban house in Acton, a West London neighborhood. He serves whiskey, the best of the best. There are about three dozen bottles lined up like trophies in his study. We toast to his new life beyond the confines of diplomacy.

In 2007, he was appointed rector of the University of Dundee for three years, a job in which he represented students in the administration of his alma mater. Since leaving the university, he has been dealing with the possible filming of his memoirs, which were published after considerable legal wrangling, and without some of the details and documents Murray had planned to include.

The book is a mix of the impressive and the pompous, and Murray often flirts with self-criticism: "I'm no hero, but in fact a very fallible human being. But when I found out how old people, women and children were being tortured, I didn't question for a moment my obligation, as the representative of the British nation, to put a stop to it. How can it be that integrity in public life is such a rarity that one is already declared a hero for exhibiting a modicum of decency?"

It looks as though things could work out with Hollywood soon. "In all modesty, many a Bond film had a more boring story than mine," says Murray. Brad Pitt is reportedly interested in producing it.

Angelina Jolie is a possible contender for Nadira's role -- or Nadira herself. The Uzbek beauty isn't commenting, however. She has taken a break from acting to devote time to her family. She has tamed and married her macho party animal. She is carrying their 17-month-old son in her arms. The boy is named Cameron, after an old Scottish clan, not the new prime minister in London.

Murray has joined the Liberal Democrats, although he is now upset with the party for having entered into a coalition with the Conservatives. He isn't one for compromises. His career crunches along, perhaps in the direction of international fame or perhaps in the direction of oblivion, but always with a feverish sense of excitement. Neuen's career track as a senior civil servant, on the other hand, is gliding, very predictably, smoothly and honorably, toward retirement.


'Appeasing the Dictator'
The provocateur and the appeaser, the man who refuses to apologize for anything and the man with an explanation for everything, the man who constantly rubs people the wrong way and the man who fits in everywhere -- they have never met. But it's safe to say that the "Maharaja of Whiskeypur" and "Fürst Bismarck Quelle" have nothing but supreme contempt for each other.

Neuen, in his office at the embassy in Tashkent, whispers almost inaudibly when he talks about Murray: "When you work as a diplomat, you have to understand and accept your job description. The current British ambassador is still cleaning up the mess his predecessor left him."

Murray, in his house in London, almost shouts his opinion about Neuen: "Oh, the Germans! In Uzbekistan, they were always the ones who, of all Western countries, were the most interested in appeasing the dictator. Is that what they've learned from their history?"

Link to the article: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,724471,00.html

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Uzbekistan Urges Probe of Kyrgyz Unrest

Sept. 22, 2010, UNITED NATIONS — Uzbek President Islam Karimov has called for an independent international investigation of the June ethnic violence in southern Kyrgyzstan that sent more than 100,000 refugees into his country.


In the text of remarks to a UN development summit, Karimov said such an investigation was the only way to promote reconciliation between the ethnic Kyrgyz and Uzbeks who each make up roughly half of the population in the south of Kyrgyzstan.
Nearly 400 people were killed in several days of violence, which began on June 10 and were triggered by attacks by unidentified people in balaclavas. Unofficial estimates place the death toll much higher. Many victims were shot and some, including women and children, were burned inside their homes.
Earlier this year, the New York-based Human Rights Watch nonprofit group said some Kyrgyz government troops took part in mob attacks against Uzbeks and that a brutal official probe into the violence was making matters worse.
In Kyrgyzstan, which hosts U.S. and Russian military air bases, the interim government has struggled to assert control over southern parts of the country since assuming power following a popular revolt in April.
"I am convinced that the timely holding of objective and independent international investigations which rule out any prejudice and one-sided approach … can pave the way to reconciliation and accord between the Kyrgyz and Uzbek minority in the south of Kyrgyzstan," Karimov said.
He said violence could erupt anew without such an investigation.
Karimov rejected calls for an international investigation into Uzbekistan's handling of a 2005 riot in the town of Andijan where, according to witnesses, government troops killed hundreds of protesters.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Kyrgyzstan: Kyrgyz army took part in ethnic violence of June

Human Rights Watch makes accusation after hundreds of eyewitness accounts, photos and even videos from the satellite. Armoured army vehicles swept away the Uzbek barricades and left open the field for attack. The demand for an international inquiry.


Bishkek (AsiaNews / HRW) – Some army forces facilitated the massacre of ethnic Uzbeks, when violence erupted in June 2010 in southern Kyrgyzstan, Human Rights Watch (HRW) has denounced in a report published this week.  The group also accuses the government of not having carried out detailed investigations on the responsibility for the violence. The report gathered more than 200 eyewitness accounts, statements of pro-rights and law enforcement groups, images and photographs taken by satellites, pictures and video footage.


HRW said the violence erupted on June 10 when a large group of ethnic Uzbeks gathered as a result of small clashes between the two ethnic groups. During the night there were several violent attacks and burning of houses of ethnic Kyrgyz in Osh and nearby villages. From early morning of June 11 until June 14 Kyrgyz attacked and burnt shops and houses in Uzbek districts of Osh, Jalalabad Bazar-Kurgan and other southern cities, in some cases levelling entire neighbourhoods. The official toll speaks of at least 371 deaths and thousands of homes destroyed, but many believe that the dead number more than 1000.


According to testimonies gathered by HRW, armoured military vehicles with camouflaged army men removed the barricades erected by ethnic Uzbeks, so that the mob was able to penetrate the Uzbek neighbourhoods. Other witnesses saw armed men following the armoured vehicles and firing against those who resisted, only to then step aside while a mob attacked and burned the houses. In other cases, there is evidence that the army disarmed the ethnic Uzbeks, while protecting the Kyrgyz assault.


This evidence contrasts with statements of authorities that ethnic Kyrgyz had stolen some armoured vehicles. Now HRW is calling on the Government to make more detailed investigations into those tragic days and the army’s role, which does not appear to have protected the neighbourhoods of ethnic Uzbeks from aggression.


The report also found numerous violations of law by the army, which in the days after the massacres insulted and beat residents, made illegal arrests and searches in areas of ethnic Uzbeks. In the village of Nariman security forces wounded 39 people, with 2 deaths. HRW reports at least 60 cases of torture against detainees, particularly ethnic Uzbeks, to obtain "confessions", with at least one prisoner who died.


Ole Solvang, co-author of the HRW report says that "It’s clear that the massive ethnic violence posed colossal challenges for Kyrgyz security forces. Yet we found that some of the security forces became part of the problem rather than the solution”.


"Now - Solvang continues - national and international inquiries need to find out just what the government forces did and   whether the authorities did everything they could to protect people. This is crucial both for justice and to learn lessons about how to respond to any new outbreaks”.


Meanwhile, HRW demands that " abuses against detainees immediately cease." " The June violence has left deep scars" - Solvang concludes - "For those scars to heal there needs to be justice for what happened and equal protection for all ethnic communities "
Source: Asia News

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Getting To The Roots Of Resentment In Kyrgyzstan

Getting To The Roots Of Resentment In Kyrgyzstan


An ethnic Uzbek woman and her child, just returned to Osh from Uzbekistan, walks past a house that was burned down during ethnic clashes.
An ethnic Uzbek woman and her child, just returned to Osh from Uzbekistan, walks past a house that was burned down during ethnic clashes.
July 04, 2010
By Madeleine Reeves
As the violence in the southern Kyrgyz city of Osh recedes from international headlines and thousands of families struggle to rebuild lives in the shells of burned-out homes, a host of questions remain about the causes and implications of the conflict.

According to the UN, the violence that consumed Osh was “orchestrated, targeted and well-planned." The Kyrgyzstan security services, for their part, have directed blame toward relatives of ousted President Kurmanbek Bakiev and an alliance of Islamic groups in the region, whom they accuse of taking advantage of the “hidden interethnic tensions” between the Uzbek and Kyrgyz populations in the south of the country to instigate violence to disrupt Kyrgyzstan’s June 27 referendum on a new constitution.

Amid the search for proximal causes, secret meetings, and string-pulling actors, we risk obscuring attention to the structural conditions that allowed grievances to grow so that violence could be fomented so quickly along ethnic lines. For all that the violence was provoked, instigated, funded, and manipulated by external actors, the speed at which it escalated and the scale of brutality toward those perceived as ethnically “other” raise challenging questions about how this could happen now – and about how growing resentments about representation, voice, and economic opportunity can be addressed in the long term.

Understanding such grievances, as Dave Gullette argued in a recent analysis, demands looking at economics -- at the decline in real incomes that brought people onto the streets in the spring to protest the inequality and corruption that characterized the Bakiev years and at the lack of economic opportunities that led hundreds of thousands to search for work abroad. But economics alone doesn’t explain conflict. We also need to look at how economic grievances have translated into anxieties about marginalization from civic life and economic opportunity: how anger has become ethnicized.

Within the Uzbek community in southern Kyrgyzstan, there is long-standing frustration at exclusion from national-level jobs in the state administration, as well as under-representation in the military, the police, and the security services. As one Uzbek interviewee commented to a foreign journalist: “Why should I bother studying for five years if I know that the only place for me to go afterward is to sell in the market?”

At the same time – and a crucial factor for understanding ethnic Kyrgyz grievances in the current conflict – much of the rural Kyrgyz population has felt unable to make a viable livelihood in their own state. As many as half of all rural families have sons and daughters working as wage-laborers in Russia and in the south of the country where, for historical and structural reasons, the Uzbeks have come to dominate in the cities’ small businesses and where much of the visible wealth appears to be in Uzbek hands.

Played Into Anxieties

Nationalist politicians have been able to play into such sentiments with remarkable ease, particularly following the April 7 uprising in Bishkek that ousted Bakiev. They have also played into anxieties that demands for a greater political voice among the Uzbek community are “really” concealing a demand for autonomy, made possible by the migration of rural Kyrgyz. Indeed, among Kyrgyz journalists and political analysts, it is common to hear concerns that the disproportionate migration of ethnic Kyrgyz from southern Kyrgyzstan has created a “sharp disbalance in the proportion of Uzbeks and Kyrgyz in the south of [the] republic,” as political scientist Nur Omarov put it recently in an interview.

“Disbalance," of course, is a political category – and a socially productive one. Such anxieties do not by themselves explain last month’s violence, but they do deserve attention if we are to understand how grievances can become politically generative. The claim that the Kyrgyz “ought” to be the masters in their own home -- that as Kyrgyz living in a Kyrgyz republic they ought not to live worse than their Russian, Uzbek, or Dungan neighbors -- is one that has real traction, perhaps especially for that cohort of young, rural men who didn’t grow up in cosmopolitan Osh and for whom its very diversity is threatening.

There is another component in all this, however, which concerns how state weakness has come to undermine political discussion, sap the rule of law, and legitimize violence as a means to political ends. What we have seen since April – indeed, since the ouster of President Askar Akaev in 2005 – is a progressive normalization of political violence. Often, indeed, violence seems the only vehicle that will produce meaningful political results, and it has become symbolically and discursively legitimated as such after the “heroic” seizure of the White House in April.

This is the logic of “grab and run” -- of seizure as legitimate if “the people” are on your side. It is a political modality visible in the “revolutions” of 2005 and 2010 and in the “rough justice” of land appropriation that followed these political coups. It is visible in the periodic seizure of regional administration buildings at times of political upheaval and in the elimination of political opponents during the years of Bakiev’s rule. The tragedy of the Osh conflict is precisely the speed with which this violence has also come to be enacted against perceived wrongdoing, of “them” against “us” (and perhaps especially, of "them" against “our women”). Violence has shifted from the realm of institutions to communities and is now outside the rule of law.

Emergent Parallel Lives

These factors have important implications for how some kind of trust might be restored in homes and neighborhoods that have been brutally shaken by the recent violence.

First, it suggests that in the absence of a wide-ranging independent investigation of the long-term and proximal causes of conflict, rumors, accusations, and conspiracy theories will continue to grow. In a recent interview with the news agency Ferghana.ru, Norwegian human rights activist Ivar Dale described a situation of emergent parallel lives, in which Kyrgyz and Uzbek communities are isolated from and distrustful of one another, each side with its own hardening narrative of who started the conflict that erupted on June 10 and who is to blame for its escalation.

Without spaces to debate these accounts – publicly, safely, with a commitment to truthfulness, and in ways that don’t presume who speaks on behalf of whom – such narratives are likely to solidify and polarize. Public appeals to harmony without recognition of real and enduring feelings of grievance, discrimination, or persecution are likely to be cosmetic at best, counterproductive at worst.

Likewise, demands, such as those issued to journalists by the provisional government on June 14 to avoid reference to “international” or “interethnic” conflict, risk foreclosing sustained analysis about how and why ethnicity came to be mobilized with such destructive speed. The lesson of violence elsewhere is that “interethnic conflict” can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy, in which multiple, diverse experiences of crisis get squeezed into a single, one-size-fits-all narrative. As one recent witness to events in Osh commented in an e-mail: “I don’t think what happened in Osh on June 10-12 was an interethnic conflict, but it risks becoming one.”

Colossal Challenge

Second, it suggests that reestablishing the rule of law – and trust in the impartiality of that law – is going to be crucial to moving out of the crisis. This is true not just in the obvious sense that the guilty must be punished and seen to be punished within a framework of law (something sadly lacking in the video footage of the “cleanups” that have been happening in certain Osh neighborhoods in recent days). It is also, more fundamentally, because the real challenge of the provisional government – and of the not-so-provisional government that succeeds it – is going to be to delegitimize violent seizure as a political modality. This is a colossal challenge, and one that will be the work of months if not years.

Kyrgyzstan has a freshly minted constitution following the hasty referendum on June 27. But while this is symbolically important as the foundation upon which other laws can be enacted – a symbolic “stop” to violent politics and a foundational act of state-making – the constitution is only as strong as the institutions that defend it and only as effective as the popular legitimacy that it holds.

What matters now is strengthening those institutions that allow discussion to flourish – including hard, open, and inclusive discussion about the sources of last month’s violence – without silencing difference through political exclusion or the threat of political violence.

Madeleine Reeves is a research fellow with the Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change at the University of Manchester. The views expressed in this commentary are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect those of RFE/RL.

Sunday, June 27, 2010

Aljazeera's reporter tells the story from Kyrgyzstan - A remarkable story - Some significant points are in bold

Southern Kyrgyzstan pogroms
By Clayton Swisher on June 26th, 2010
Photo by Reuters

In a matter of months, there will be a number of investigations into why such intense violence was wrought on the ethnic Uzbek populations in the oblasts of Osh and Jalalabad.

None of the explanations I've gotten seem to pass the sniff test.

The most popular is that it was agitated by remnants of Kurmanbek Bakiyev, the ousted president, seeking to "counter-coup" the interim government headed by Roza Otunbayeva.

There may be some truth to that claim, but it can't explain the support base this ethnic violence had; the vehement passions of the southern Kyrgyz population against their Uzbek compatriots, who have also called the Fergana valley home since time immemorial.

Insults and blame

Everywhere I went this past week it was in my face. At the apartment we rented in Jalalabad from an ethnic Kyrgyz, it made for an ugly final night.

Our landlord was a Kyrgyz and did not much appreciate us giving one of several boxes of our remaining food rations to our local Uzbek chef. Within minutes, two seemingly polite, motherly types were exchanging fisticuffs in our courtyard. 

The pleas from our Kyrgyz fixer, a talented young lawyer from Bishkek named Nasyr, were ignored. Within minutes Nasyr was being insulted for defending our cook as a "northern collaborator" who "is the reason why the world is taking the side of the Uzbeks".
An English-speaking Kyrgyz who lived in our building had earlier tried to convince our team that the Uzbeks were to blame for all that is wrong in this country.

She said that Uzbeks took all the good jobs, controlled all the money, and had it far better say, than a Kyrgyz would living in Uzbekistan under the arbitrary lines drawn here decades ago that fostered the present ethnic collision course. 

What she and many others have failed to explain is how the successful merchant class of Uzbeks here have wielded a disproportionate amount of political power or influence with Bishkek. Clearly they have not.


On my trip south with the interim president aboard the presidential aircraft, Roza Otunbayeva, acknowledged how Uzbeks are blamed for their success, and how statements by ethnic Uzbek leaders about having their language officially recognized last month in Jalalabad, could not have come at a worse moment.

Her military and law-enforcement apparatus is weak, 
as she also stated in this interview, and overwhelmingly staffed by Kyrgyz. 

Controlling the guns

In Central Asia, as in many other places I've visited, who controls the guns is often who wields the real power. That's an even more acute reality in Kyrgyzstan where the armed forces are presided over by an unelected transitional government.

Allegations of Kyrgyz military involvement in the sectarian killings has been well documented by this channel. But US and international calls for an impartial investigation by the Kyrgyz government strike me as very similar to the hollow slogans I heard last month in Washington in response to the Gaza flotilla crisis.

Surely the notion that those implicated get to investigate themselves is why someone came up with the "fox watching the hen house" comparison. 

That's a shame because reconciling these communities will require a factual understanding of what actually took place.

In Osh, we visited Uzbek neighborhoods completely levelled by ethnically-motivated arson. That's a claim I feel comfortable repeating given that I saw, with my own eyes, so many of the homes with "KYG" spray painted on their doors left untouched (the targeting of ethnic neighborhoods is also corroborated by satellite imagery). 

Flying over the Uzbek areas of Osh and Jalalabad, my cameraman and I saw innumerable "SOS" markings, a plea to the heavens that went unanswered as more than 400,000 were forced to leave. Seeing them up close on the ground gave me chills.

Signs of danger

The occasional young Uzbek would venture out behind a barricade to query us, as if they were the only surviving humans following a natural disaster.

When we tried to approach three elderly Uzbek women, employed to help clean the debris, a group of Kyrgyz women came from nowhere to shout them down, calling them "liars" and accusing them of whipping up tears merely to please our cameras.  We left the scene after it became clear we were attracting a mob.  

In the Krygyz south, large groups have all the signs of danger. Paramilitaries are everywhere - young men not in uniform carrying kalishnikovs, some of them wearing ski masks.

The only sign of professionalism I saw at the random checkpoints in Osh was just outside the devastated village of Nariman early on Thursday morning.

We happened upon a squad of what appeared to be Russian soldiers (that is, they had all the features of troops from the Russian Federation), wearing unmarked uniforms that resembled those of the Kyrgyz military.

It was clear to us that Moscow may be quietly putting small numbers of boots on the ground to protect strategic assets (in this case, the airport at Osh which is vital to safeguard Russian humanitarian efforts).

Such a force in small numbers would hardly be enough to stabilise things, as the Kyrgyz-dominated military does not think they're in the wrong and, even worse, have an investigation to fear. 

Returning home

In Bekabad, near the Krygyz-Uzbek border outside Jalalabad, we reported on thousands of ethnic Uzbeks that were coming home. In most instances, they have no homes to return to.

The head of Unicef in Kyrgyzstan told me that many were staying with relatives in unaffected areas, or crowded into farms and forced to sleep alongside livestock.

The governor of Jalalabad, a Kyrgyz, told me they were providing general purpose tents for Uzbeks choosing to return. But we saw nary a one, as most seemed to dissolve back into familial networks that run deeper into the country than just Osh or Jalalabad. 

The politics of their return is yet another matter. Better late than never, Otunbayeva made several short trips to the areas hit hardest. But that was only after the killings had largely subsided.

Her exhausted looking minister of defence and his subordinates seemed to understand her message that the international conversation needed to be changed by responsible official actions to help Uzbeks return immediately. 

It is working for the moment, but many believe Otunbayeva only wants the appearance of life returning to normal as the country heads toward a referendum on June 27.

There may be some truth to that. The bigger picture item for Otunbayeva and her interim government is to get the seal of legitimacy so that reforms can finally begin.

Then, and only then, so the thinking goes, can they work out the underlying causes behind the pogroms that killed so many. 

Monday, June 21, 2010

Kyrgyz Law Enforcement Abuse Their Power – Beat, Loot and Torture Uzbek Civilians

Some remarkable excerpts from the stories of prominent Web sites covering the tragic events in Kyrgyzstan:


The New York Times’ story:

Barriers Removed in Kyrgyzstan Despite Uzbek Protests


“But at one checkpoint, one of the guards, an ethnic Kyrgyz named Bektemir Ergashev, 39, said the authorities were only searching for weapons to ensure that violence does not flare again.

Still, Mr. Ergashev, who said he was a former Kyrgyz soldier called up to help with security, made clear that he believed the Uzbeks got what they deserved.

He repeated a widely held rumor among ethnic Kyrgyz, saying that when the rioting broke out, Uzbeks had invaded a Kyrgyz women’s dormitory and raped several women. The police and hospitals have never provided any confirmation that such an assault occurred. Nor have Kyrgyz officials offered any evidence to back it up.

“It was only when we heard that our women had been raped that we gathered together and decided that we had to defend the Kyrgyz people,” he said. “We had to take revenge on the Uzbeks.”

The violence in southern Kyrgyzstan killed thousands, mostly Uzbeks. It also touched off a major refugee crisis as hundreds of thousands of Uzbeks tried to escape, many going across the border to Uzbekistan, where large camps have been established. Ethnic Uzbeks make up only about 15 percent of Kyrgyzstan’s population, but they are concentrated here in the south, and they form a prosperous merchant class.”

Human Rights Watch Observations:
Kyrgyzstan: Security Forces Abuse Civilians

“A joint group of Kyrgyz police and military forces entered Nariman, on the northern outskirts of Osh, at about 6 a.m. to conduct a search-and-seizure operation. Nariman residents told Human Rights Watch that groups of 15 to 20 armed uniformed men went from house to house demanding identification documents and information about the killing of the village police chief, whom police say Nariman residents killed on June 12, 2010.

After several residents had presented their documents, the security forces started beating them with rifle butts and kicking them, victims and witnesses told Human Rights Watch. Residents said police demanded to know who was responsible for killing the police chief. The forces also smashed cars, furniture, and windows, and took money and jewelry from the residents. More than a dozen victims were brought to the Nariman hospital, where Human Rights Watch researchers saw them arriving and interviewed them.

One of the witnesses told Human Rights Watch that the security forces entered her home and beat four male relatives, causing the death of her 58-year-old husband, Sharabiddin Dosmatov. She said, "We trusted them. They were from the army. We were just sitting there at home. They tore my husband's passport and broke our cell phones. Then they severely beat my husband with their rifle butts. He died five hours later from the injuries."


Uzbek woman mourning her husband after Kyrgyz law enforcement beat him to death / Human Rights Watch

Some said that the security forces tore, burned, or took away their passports. One resident, who showed Human Rights Watch the burned passports of her male relatives, said that the security forces told the family, ‘You're not people, you don't need passports anymore.’”

Ferghana.ru story about death toll in Osh:

Kyrgyzstan: Unofficial information of local authorities indicates 1526 people killed in Osh and surrounding districts


“Referring to official data of Healthcare Ministry, Kyrgyz mass media report 179 people killed in the recent massacre. Meanwhile, the official government admits that the death toll can be much bigger since many people get buried without being transported to medical organizations or mortuary.

According to unofficial information, received by Ferghana.Ru from local authorities, 1526 people were killed in Osh and surrounding districts. Our sources indicate most of them were ethnic Uzbeks.

The number of witnesses, including local dwellers and foreign journalists, indicate that Kyrgyz houses and shops survived through lootings while the houses of ethnic Uzbeks were totally devastated.”

Kyrgyz mobs burning alive Uzbek people in Osh

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

The Number of Dead Increases Each Day in Southern Kyrgyzstan

According to the Kyrgyz official sources, the number of dead as a result of the ethnic tensions in southern Kyrgyzstan has reached 179 (in Osh 132; in Jalal-Abad 47).

As of now there is no precise figure of the dead. According to the Associated Press, the International Committee of the Red Cross spokesman, Christian Cardon, said "we are talking about several hundreds."

According to Al Jazeera, a spokeswoman for the ICRC in Bishkek, Aigul Sigulina, said that "the number of people killed is higher than reported in the media because we have seen massive amounts of people buried.”

Kyrgyzstan's interim President, Roza Otunbayeva, also acknowledged that the real death toll likely was several times higher than official count of 179 people killed, because many victims were buried by their relatives the same day. Nearly 1,900 have been injured, the Kyrgyz Health Ministry said.

Killed young Uzbeks

Otunbayeva claims that many instigators have been detained and they are giving evidence on Bakiyev's involvement in the events.

AP reports that Rupert Colville, spokesman for the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, told reporters in Geneva there was evidence the violence was coordinated and began with five simultaneous attacks in Osh by men wearing ski masks.

U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay, also said the fighting "appears to be orchestrated, targeted and well-planned" and urged authorities to act before it spread further.

Kyrgyz Deputy Security Chief, Kubat Baibolov, said that militants from neighboring Tajikistan drove around Osh in vehicles with tinted windows shooting both Uzbeks and Kyrgyz last week to spark the violence.

Baibolov claimed that these militants were employed by people close to the Bakiyev family and that some of the Tajik militants had been detained and testified about their role in the unrest.

The office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) said 200,000 people had been displaced within the country in addition to 75,000 who had crossed the border into neighboring Uzbekistan.

Tens of thousands of Uzbeks are now in 30 different refugee camps in Uzbekistan, including several camps around the eastern city of Andijan.


Uzbek refugees

Inside Story - Kyrgyzstan: Days of violence

Refugees Crossing Uzbek Border




Refugees fleeing Kyrgyzstan are still pouring into Uzbekistan. According to the Uzmetronom, Uzbek border is open and accepting refugees.

Other noteworthy remarks:
1. UN Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay said there was evidence of indiscriminate killings - including of children - and of rapes.
2. Uzbek refugees say that armored vehicles in Osh drove through streets in Uzbek neighborhoods, shooting at civilians and clearing the way for gangs following behind.
3. Pascale Meige Wagner, from the International Committee for the Red Cross, said the death toll was an underestimate.

Monday, June 14, 2010

First hand story of the violence written by a Peace Corps Volunteer from Osh

A PCV's story from Osh City
Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:11 am (PDT)

This is from a PCV stationed in Osh City. It's a shocking story and they need our help. I called the US Embassy in Bishkek and they said they are still just trying to rescue all the Americans down there. There needs to be an intervention down there by Russia, the US and/or the UN to stabilize things.

Peace Corps Volunteers first hand experience in Southern Kyrgyzstan

Yesterday at 9:34pm

Hi all,

Before I explain anything, let me just say that I am completely safe. I and the other peace corps volunteers (except for 3 village volunteers in Osh who will be moved tomorrow but are safe right now) have been moved to the American military base outside of the Kyrgyz capitol of Bishkek. I totally and completely safe right now, and I will definitely never be returning to Osh.

I don't know if you have been following the news. Mostly just NPR and Al Jazeera have reported, but they know very little as the conflict is so bad no one can get in.

I just had the most terrifying experience of my life. I'm going to let you know so you can get a small picture of what it is like where I live. And I am only letting you know because I am now out of the conflict.

It was Friday at 1am and I was awoken by a phone call from another friend in the Peace Corps who lives in my neighborhood in Osh. He was wondering if I heard any strange noises on the streets. I didn't at that point, but I got up and looked out my balcony (it must be noted that I am the only volunteer in Osh who lives on the main street with my windows facing it as well, so they wanted me to look for them. I am on the 2nd floor). What I saw was horrifying. I looked to my right and saw a fire burning in the street about a block away and men screaming loudly around it. I thought they were just screaming to put out the fire. I waited a bit and noticed the fire growning and growing. It cast a red glow across the whole street I lived on. I then turned to the left and saw a hundred or more local men walking down towards my building carrying axes and shotguns. They were yelling cheers and shooting into the air. They began to set fire to more buildings around me, while breaking the glass and doors of the stores on the first floor of my building and the buildings around me. I was scared and had no idea what to do so I called our safety officer at Peace Corps and she had no idea what was going on (I woke her up). More and more men gathered in the red glow of the burning buildings around me (at least 300 by now), and they began to throw rocks at buildings. I was walking towards the bathroom to seek cover (as this is the only room in my apartment that doesn't have a window facing the street), and a large rock smashed through my window and flew right by my head. I was lucky to have missed it as it was a fist sized stone. I spent the rest of the night hiding in my bathroom, staying on the phone with peace corps, and sneaking peeks to see if my building was on fire. Luckily just as my building was going to get caught by the flames, the fire department came, dispersed the crowd and put out the fire (which I am surprised they put out so much because we don't have fire hydrants here).

I can't even properly describe the terror I felt. I have never felt so trapped in my life. I didn't know what to do if my building caught on fire because if I ran outside I would have surely been killed. I am so grateful that the fire stopped when it did. It was also incredibly terrifying because this incident was about 2 hours long. I spent the rest of the night packing my emergency bag and trying to rest in the bathtub, but I was unsuccessful as I was so nervous about men climbing onto my balcony or my apartment being set ablaze. I can't get the image out of my head of all those mens and guns shadows destroying my neighborhood.

I spent the whole time praying for dawn because I thought it would get better with light. Well, it didn't. 5 o'clock hit and Kyrgyz men came with crowbars and started smashing up the stores right across the street from my building. This continued until a crowd of Uzbek men came and chased them away with rocks. Yes, if you didn't know, this whole conflict is about the ethnic tension between the Uzbeks and Kyrgyz, possibly started by a third party for political reasons.

Hundreds of Uzbeks gathered again on my street, but soon scattered into the distant neighborhoods because of police. I was then called by Peace Corps and told to move about a block away to another Peace Corps volunteers house, where many of us would gather to be safe. I did so, and it was relatively safe. 6 of us spent the rest of that first day trying to rest, conserve our energy (I didnt get to eat for 2 days because the gas and electricity were shut off and no stores were open), and hope for the best. We just heard distant fighting and shots the rest of that day and then that night military tanks were roaming the city firing into crowds to disperse them.

The next day (Saturday), we all woke up and got the 4 other PC volunteers in the city to join us (thats 10 now). We were told by PC that we were leaving to the airport to catch a flight to the capital, but the roads were blocked and shooting was heavy on the way. We then had to wait for a new plan. In the mean time, some local Kyrgyz threw a bottle and rock into our window and smashed it. We had to create an emergency plan because we heard that molotov cocktails were being thrown into windows, so we needed to do fire prevention. We positioned the bed and cushions against all the windows, hoping that a molotov would bounce off back into the street. Luckily this was never tested. We spent the rest of the afternoon in complete silence (all phones were off except for mine to conserve our batteries. I kept mine on for communication with PC), and getting many different changing plans from PC.

Finally, at about 6pm we were picked up by 5 kyrgyz men (trusted and hired by PC) who had masks on and guns. They were to escort us to a bus that would take us to helicoptor. We left with them, but the bus got lost so we were exposed on the main street for 20 minutes. It was so eery as all the streets were empty, except for when random cars would drive by with dozens of men and guns in them. One of the cars was stopped on the way by a group of Kyrgyz who pointed their guns at the volunteers in it and screamed, "If any of you are Uzbeks we will kill you all." Luckily our drivers were Kyrgyz and we were somewhat "safer" because we were in Kyrgyz territory. They went away and we spent the next 20 minutes trying to get the bus to come to us while watching troops of Kyrgyz driving past us with guns. We were so scared of being shot at this point. Luckily, we got to the bus that was controlled by the Kyrgyzstan border control, who was to take us to a helicoptor in the city. We got in and after driving a certain way we were blocked by a crowd of hundreds and hundreds of Kyrgyz men who were demanding the guns from the military tank escorting us. The military refused and started firing guns into the air. We all ducked down, but I saw that more gunshots were being fired around us by the local kyrgyz and then rocks and sticks were being smashed against our car windows. We were in this position for about 5 minutes and we were all in control, but I truly felt for the first time in my life that I could have died at that moment. So many men screaming, so many shots in my direction, so much anger. I just could truly see myself not surviving that moment. Again, I can't describe how that danger feels. It is beyond numbing.

Luckily the tank eventually decided to plow through the crowd and we followed. We made it to the heli base and were lifted to the Osh airport where we got a charter flight to Bishkek. We are now safe at the base while our homes and friends burn in the fires of ethnic conflict.

While we feel grateful to be alive and gone, I personally feel guilty because I am so privileged to have the ability to be lifted out of the danger like that while my local friends and coworkers hide for their lives. It is a horrible feeling to have left them to die. Hundreds are dead already, thousands are injured. 150,000 Uzbeks have fled to the Uzbek border; women are handing their babies off to Uzbekistan soldiers at the border so that at least they survive.

Whats worse is that the Uzbeks are not only blamed for this whole thing (as the ethic and hated minority), but they are being targeted not only by Kyrgyz, but also the military. We hear from our Uzbek friends that police are openly killing defenseless Uzbeks on the street. Entire Uzbek neighborhoods are destroyed in Osh. I will never forget the last image I had, flying away in a heli over the city, seeing entire blocks of houses scorched to the ground, with smoke and fire covering the whole city. It will haunt me forever.


Whats worse is that the Kyrgyz government is only providing humanitarian assistance to the Kyrgyz, and leaving the Uzbek out. Please urge your congressperson to push the american government to urge the Kyrgyz government to provide equal aid to all ethnicities. PLEASE. These are my friends and neighbors that are being murdered. Just take a few minutes and call/email. It is an emergency situation, no time to lose. Please leave my name out of your message though.

If you want to see the most accurate news please check out Al Jazeeras Central Asia section.

The rest of the country is completely stable as Uzbeks are mainly just in the south, so don't worry about me being in the north now.

I love you all and I am think I will be home in America soon. Help the victims of Kyrgyzstan's latest violence.

Theo Davis

Refugees Engulf Uzbekistan Fleeing from Violence in Southern Kyrgyzstan

The Uzbek government said it had registered 45,000 refugees (not counting children) and camps were set up for them. The Vice Premier, Abdulla Aripov, asked for international help to the refugees.
www.eurasianet.org
Aripov also added that the border will be closed on June 14 because of the huge number of influx of refugees.
According to CNN, about 80,000 Uzbeks have fled Kyrgyzstan, and International Committee of the Red Cross official described the situation as a "humanitarian catastrophe".
www.eurasianet.org
Russian news agency RIA-Novosti also reported that members of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), which includes Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan, met today and discussed the crisis. The result of the discussion was to provide emergency aid to Kyrgyzstan to quell the violence.

1. CNN reporter's coverage from Kyrgyzstan - http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/06/14/kyrgyz.violence/index.html

2. Danish Journalist's view of the conflict - http://enews.ferghana.ru/article.php?id=2640

3. Eyewitness recounts of the tragedy (in Russian, but can be translated using Google Chrome or other Web translation service) - http://www.ferghana.ru/article.php?id=6610

Sunday, June 13, 2010

Refugees Flee to the Border of Uzbekistan

After a few days since the ethnic tensions started in Osh, now the violence has spread to the neighboring city of Jalal-Abad. Thousands of refugees mainly elderly, women and children have flocked at the border of Uzbekistan.

According to BBC and other news agencies, most of the refugees have been let into Uzbekistan, but many more are still stranded at the border.

The Kyrgyz government says that it is not being able to deal with this issue and asked Russia to intervene and send a peacekeeping force. Russian President, Dmitry Medvedev, said it cannot intervene since it is an internal issue of Kyrgyzstan.

According to RFE/RL, since the conflict started 84 people died and thousands are wounded. However, eyewitnesses claim that the death toll is more than the official numbers and bodies can be found on the streets of Osh.

Related videos:
1. BBC News - Hundreds Flee Kyrgyz Violence - - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/asia_pacific/10300418.stm
2. Aljazeera - Uzbeks Flee Kyrgyzstan Violence - - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nht2UrGI2tc
3. Eurasianet - Panic at Border As Uzbek Refugees Flee Unrest in Osh - - http://www.eurasianet.org/node/61285

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Ethnic tensions erupt in Osh, Kyrgyzstan

So, here we go again. The ethnic tensions that happened in 1990 just before the collapse of the Soviet Union has erupted again after just a few months of deadly protests in Bishkek, capital of Kyrgyzstan, and governmental change. The Kyrgyz interim government blames former president Kurmanbek Bakiyev for current unrests and expressed state of emergency in the country.

According to the eye witnesses, gun fires are heard in the city of Osh. Buildings are burnt and many people have died (45 died and 637 wounded). The city is on the curfew and Kyrgyz law enforcement and military are sent to quell the conflict. However, eyewitnesses say that law enforcement controls only entries and exits to the city and mobs clash inside the city. The clashes also spread to the other close cities such as Jalal-Abad.

The Uzbek President Islam Karimov at the summit of Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) member states in Tashkent said that SCO forces can help with stabilizing the region.

Nonetheless, videos on youtube.com with eyewitnesses claim that some mobs follow Kyrgyz law enforcement and burn houses and other buildings. 

1. Video on Osh clashes (June 11, 2010) ---- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZrWhgcSvpo

Sunday, April 4, 2010

The Hunt for Big Businessmen in Uzbekistan

Was it a way to clean up the endemic corruption in the republic or a new method of money extortion?

In March 2010, many of the leading businessmen in Uzbekistan were hunted and some of them imprisoned. The reasons for imprisonment and search arrests were not clearly explained by the law enforcement. Local media and official sources reported that some of them are being investigated for financial crimes ranging from tax evasion to corruption.

This campaign started with the detention of the head of Tashkent’s largest wholesale market ‘Karavan’, Dmitry Lim, and his 50 high-ranking employees.

According to
RFE/RL, also detained are Batyr Rakhimov, owner of 'Kapital Bank', a tungsten deposit in Jizzah Region and Tashkent’s ‘Pahtakor’ football club. His brother Bakhtiyor Rakhimov is also wanted but reportedly fled the country. Also, 'Alp Jamol-Bank' owner, Mukhiddin Asomiddinov, and 'Kyzylkumtcement' factory director, Rajabbai Jumanazarov, have fled the country.

The chairman of the ‘Zeromax’ company, Mirodil Jalalov, who worked with the president’s daughter Gulnara Karimova, is rumored to have been detained or to have fled the country.

According to Uznews.net, this campaign started after President Islam Karimov’s speech given in December 2009 in which he stated that Uzbekistan was not a country of rich tycoons.

However, after a while, Batyr Rakhimov was released on bail which confirmed some observers’ suggestions that the move against businessmen was a state-sponsored racket.

Rumors also suggested that this campaign was prompted by the desire of authorities to bridge gaps in the budget and that detained Batyr Rahimov paid in-between $100,000 to $1 million for his release on bail. This may mean that many other wealthy detainees will also pay for their releases soon.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Uzbek Journalists Facing Pressure For Their Professional Activities

According to Ferghana.ru, several journalists who work (or worked) for the Western and Russia-based news agencies were interrogated by the Tashkent City Prosecutor's Office on January 7, 2010. 

The Tashkent City Prosecutor’s Office invited Vasiliy Markov, Sid Yanyshev, Abdumalik Boboev, Khusniddin Kutbiddinov and Marina Kozlova to a meeting to discuss their journalistic activities. Vasiliy Markov and Abdumalik Boboev refused to show up without official notice.

It’s interesting that each of the journalists were presented with their own detailed record of articles, biographies and other documents. The representative of the prosecutor’s office informed them that these documents were delivered from the National Security Service (NSS) and the Uzbek Foreign Affairs Ministry.

I totally agree with one of the journalist’s (Andrey Kudryashev) opinion regarding the intimidation by the Uzbek law enforcement. He notes that “I was never the opposition member. However, I see high risk of turning into totalitarian society. Authoritarian rule suppresses the political opponents. Totalitarian regime punishes everyone for counteraction, lack of loyalty, independence and free thinking.”

Journalistic criticism helps to realize mistakes and lacks and is conducive for improvement. Intimidation and corruption will not help the country to bring back its bright history and future.